The Old Testament was written in Hebrew. The New Testament in Koine Greek and a few sayings in Aramaic.
-
Unrivaled Manuscript Authority: The New Testament is supported by a vastly higher number of ancient manuscripts than any other classical work. Scholars have cataloged approximately 5,800 Greek manuscripts, over 10,000 Latin Vulgate manuscripts, and more than 9,300 other early versions (Syriac, Coptic, etc.), totaling nearly 25,000 ancient copies.
-
The Bibliographical Test: When applying the "bibliographical test"—a method used by historians to determine the reliability of ancient documents—the Bible far surpasses its peers. For comparison, Homer’s Iliad, the second-best-preserved ancient text, has fewer than 2,000 surviving manuscripts, while works by Plato and Aristotle exist in fewer than 20 copies each.
-
The Time-Gap Factor: The gap between the original composition and the earliest surviving copies is drastically shorter for the New Testament than for other ancient history.
"In no other case is the interval of time between the composition of the book and the date of the earliest extant manuscripts so short as in that of the New Testament." — Sir Frederic Kenyon, former Director of the British Museum
-
Dead Sea Scrolls Confirmation: The 1947 discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls provided a massive leap in proof for the Old Testament's preservation. These scrolls were 1,000 years older than the previously oldest known Hebrew texts (the Masoretic Text). When scholars compared them, they found them to be 95% identical, with the 5% variation consisting almost entirely of spelling differences and obvious slips of the pen.
-
Textual Stability: Despite the thousands of copies, the message remains incredibly consistent. Variations are known as "textual variants," but the vast majority are minor spelling or grammatical differences that do not affect the meaning.
"The variant readings about which any doubt remains... affect no material question of historic fact or of Christian faith and practice." — F.F. Bruce, Rylands Professor of Biblical Criticism and Exegesis
-
Old Testament Accuracy: Regarding the Hebrew Scriptures, scholar Bruce Waltke notes that the Old Testament text is so well-preserved that 90% of the text contains no significant variation, a feat attributable to the rigorous copying standards of the Jewish scribes (Masoretes) who counted every letter.
-
Historical Verification by Archaeology: Archaeology has repeatedly verified the historical reliability of the Bible's geography, chronology, and key figures.
"It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a Biblical reference." — Nelson Glueck, renowned Jewish archaeologist
-
Eyewitness Testimony: The New Testament documents were written within the lifetimes of eyewitnesses who could have disputed false claims.
"The interval then between the dates of original composition and the earliest extant evidence becomes so small as to be in fact negligible, and the last foundation for any doubt that the Scriptures have come down to us substantially as they were written has now been removed." — Sir Frederic Kenyon
-
Comparative Reliability: Scholars argue that if one rejects the Bible as unreliable due to textual reasons, one must also reject virtually all ancient history.
"To be skeptical of the resultant text of the New Testament books is to allow all of the classical antiquity to slip into obscurity, for no document of the ancient period is as well attested bibliographically as the New Testament." — John Warwick Montgomery, legal scholar and historian
-
Rigorous Scribing Methods: Jewish scribes (the Talmudists and later the Masoretes) adhered to strict rules to ensure preservation. If a single error was found in a scroll, the entire panel or scroll was often destroyed to prevent the error from being passed down. This discipline ensured the text remained virtually unchanged for millennia.
-
Early Translations as Verification: Because the Bible was translated into Latin, Syriac, and Coptic very early (2nd–4th centuries), these translations serve as a "control group." By cross-referencing these distinct language families, scholars can triangulate the original text with extreme precision.
-
The Verdict of Textual Criticism: After centuries of rigorous examination, the scholarly consensus is that the text we have today is a faithful representation of the originals.
"The Christian can take the whole Bible in his hand and say without fear or hesitation that he holds in it the true Word of God, handed down without essential loss from generation to generation throughout the centuries." — Sir Frederic Kenyon